Many concerns drew upon himself the ability of the battery (not removable) integrated on board the Samsung Galaxy S6 ( 2550 and 2600 mAh, respectively for variants flat and edge , 2800 against the Galaxy S5). A decision interpreted by many as an involution beautiful and good, but that the South Korean company has justified by appealing to the Exynos 7420 SoC with 14nm production process and the panel SuperAMOLED latest generation (both seem to require an effort energy much lower than in the recent past).
According to a test conducted by the portal laptommedia.com , the choice of a battery slightly underpowered for the Samsung Galaxy S6 does not seem to have affected the actual yield. In this regard, we report the results of the test, compared with those recorded by iPhone 6 (remember to mount a charge to 1810 mAh), which promises to be one of the most bitter rivals in the South Korean.
The first parameter considered consists in ‘ running a 3D game (participated in the test also other top of the range, S5, LG G3, Nexus Notes 4 and 6) where the Samsung Galaxy S6 remained active up to 300 minutes, beating, though not much, the iPhone 6, which threw in the towel at the 258 th around the clock.
Well the standard-bearer in Asia also web browsing over Wi-Fi , totaling 620 minutes of battery life, compared with 573 of the iPhone. 
same can not be said for the results accruing from the test telephone : the Samsung Galaxy S6, while doing better than the iPhone 6 (857 minutes), came only to share in 1082, far below the 1500 minutes of S5 and LG G3, and the 1833 Notes 4.
As a result never so disappointing? One possible explanation may lie in the lack of optimization of the part modem (having been carried out this test to display off) of the specimen in use, being still a unit tester.
No comments:
Post a Comment