Today we compare two devices by affordable Samsung Galaxy A3 and LG G4C . We have already seen the Galaxy A3 and the only negative I can find in this device is the price does not conform to the performance offered, while LG G4C has a good quality / price ratio, despite being a device to medium-low. Let’s see what lies beneath the bodies of these two smartphones.
Display
Galaxy A3 has a screen Super AMOLED 4.7 inch diagonal, resolution HD Ready (1280 x 720 pixels) and a density of 312 ppi .
LG G4C comes with a screen IPS LCD 5-inch and resolution HD Ready (1280 x 720 pixels) with a density of 294 ppi . The size of the two devices differ, because Galaxy A3 measure 134.5 x 65.2 x 7.3 mm while LG G4C measure 139.7 x 69.8 x 10.2 mm .
processor
Speaking of processor, Galaxy A3 has a Exynos 1.5 GHz Quad Core and LG G4C mount a 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 1.2 GHz Cortex-A53 Quad Core .
RAM and internal memory
Galaxy A3 has 1.5 GB of RAM and 16 GB of storage , expandable to 128 GB via Micro SD, while LG G4 c will come out of the box with 1 GB of RAM LPDDR3 and 8 GB of storage expandable to 32 GB.
Camera
As for Galaxy A3 , the rear camera is 13 Megapixel with the ability to shoot video in up Full HD at 30 fps and the front camera is 5 Megapixel and is able to shoot video in up Full HD at 30 FPS .
LG G4C is equipped with a rear camera 8 Megapixel , can shoot video in up Full HD 30 FPS and a front facing camera to 5 Megapixel that can shoot video in up Full HD 30 FPS .
Battery
battery Galaxy A3 will 2300 mAh , while LG G4C will 2540 mAh .
OS
Galaxy A3 out of the box with Android 5.1.1 Lollipop M upgradeable to Android, while LG G4C will come into our hands with Android 5.0 LG Optimus UX 4.0 IU Lollipop .
Price
The price range of Galaxy A3 is to € 329 to 399 € , while the LG G4C will € 152 – € 259 .
Buy LG G4C on Amazon
In conclusion
Both devices offer a good price for the proven performance, although we would prefer that A3 become cheaper in the next few months, but, from the technical point of view is far superior to that LG G4C , on his side, it has a lower price and performance almost identical. This does not mean that everything is reduced to pure aesthetics. Which of the two devices do you like best? What do you think would be more in line with your tastes?
No comments:
Post a Comment